Law of Entropy Degeneration

Singularity usually refers to situations in theoretical calculations where certain physical quantities diverge to infinity, become undefined, or where multiple physical quantities that should be independent are forced to collapse simultaneously into a single point. A typical example is the gravitational spacetime singularity, which emerges in the framework of general relativity as an extreme limit produced by geometric collapse. From a more intuitive perspective, traditional geometric frameworks commonly assume that (x+∣x'⟩, y+∣y'⟩)can be absolutely simplified into (x,y), implicitly asserting that the uncertainty terms ∣x′⟩ and ∣y′⟩ can be unconditionally eliminated through geometric zerobility. This convention is largely acceptable as an approximation within the Newtonian mechanics framework. However, once this assumption of absolute zerobility no longer holds, the system encounters a structural bottleneck, which manifests itself in the form of a singularity. Therefore, a singularity is not an intrinsic physical property of nature itself, but rather a structural defect arising from the traditional geometric framework’s insistence on absolute zerobility. In contrast, life does not originate from the absolutely zeroed coordinates (x,y), Instead, it emerges and evolves within the uncertainty components ∣x′⟩ and ∣y′⟩. It is precisely this non-zeroability that gives rise to the fundamental law governing biological inheritance and variation—the memory Law:n_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩. This law is also referred to as the non-simultaneous time law. Here, non-simultaneous time is a shorthand for non-zeroable simultaneous time, meaning “non-zeroable simultaneity of time.” Conventional time is constructed under Newtonian Axioms and is assumed to be absolutely zeroable. However, such a notion of time fails within biological systems. Under surface-tension–dominated frameworks, time still preserves the property of simultaneity, yet it no longer coincides with the traditional concept of absolutely zeroable simultaneous time. For this reason, it is termed non-zeroable simultaneous time. Formally, this corresponds to a time structure of the form T + ∣T'⟩, where the component ∣T'⟩ is no longer absolutely zeroable. (The zeroing of this form of time must rely on ether or on rotational momenta, which differ from traditional angular momenta in their non-simultaneous nature. We can call it as non-simultaneous angular momenta. If interpreted through a vortex model, only the parameters that enter the vortex core can be zeroed; this non-traditional geometric zeroability inevitably leads to non-simultaneous inversion.) Regardless of whether one adopts the framework of Newtonian mechanics, general relativity, or conventional quantum mechanics, rigid time itself possesses neither weight nor mass. In general relativity, variations in the rate of time flow arise from spacetime curvature and Lorentz transformations; such effects manifest as a zeroable geometric calculable property, rather than implying that time itself becomes a source of gravity. The non-simultaneous time relied upon by biological systems is fundamentally different. Using the Cavendish Mutation experiments conducted in Room B343 of the Medical Science Building at Tsinghua University, the effective curvature weight associated with entropy stability is proposed to differ from relativistic geometric effects by as much as 109 orders of magnitude. Due to ∣EP⟩, this “weight effect” cannot be used for conventional mass determination. Instead, it represents an entropy-stabilized center of gravity through ∣EP⟩, appearing as a non-zeroable weight or curvature effective. This should be interpreted as a dynamical property jointly driven by geometry and irrotational entropy, rather than a gravitational effect caused by mass or space-time curvature in the Newtonian or relativistic sense. Subsequent FHD (falling height difference) experiments conducted in (7-315 Traders Blvd E, Mississauga, ON L4Z 3E4, Canada) further explore the dynamical nature of such “weight effect.” The results deviated significantly from the rigid equal-fall assumption of legendary Galileo’s Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment. When a half-filled water bottle and a half-filled oil bottle were simultaneously released by ice-cream clips from a height of 7.04 m, the lighter oil bottle (173.274 g) hit the ground earlier than the heavier water bottle (184.125 g), issuing an FHD of approximately 21.75 cm. Similar experiments were validated on a larger scale in multiple countries. These observations suggest that the dynamic “weight effect” induced by non-rigid surface tension extends far beyond the static rigid body gravity established by Newtonian mechanics or Einstein’s general relativity. In principle, such non-rigid body gravitational phenomena could have been captured by a dynamical quantum mechanical description; however, pioneers such as Planck etc., historically neglect surface tension dynamics behind, led to the wave function being postulated as a gravity-independent probability, thereby missing such explanation opportunity. The outcome becomes more intuitive under the non-rigid Law of Entropy Degeneration: differences in liquid surface – bottle wall friction inversion momentum repetitiveness effect, which issue a non-simultaneous “gravitational effect”(or gravitational “non-rigid body elastic pullback entanglement”). The rigid body model originated as an idealized framework in the Newtonian era. Objects sufficiently close to this idealization can be treated as rigid bodies. However, wave superposition does not fundamentally belong to a rigid paradigm. In later developments, it nonetheless inherited rigid parameter processing habits, where physical quantities are handled through order truncation to control errors. This data processing approach was later extended into the Schrödinger wave function and into relativistic gravitational wave calculations. Even the fashionable interpretations of the “double-slit” interference experiment are grounded in this framework, meaning that many dynamic systems continue to be dealt in a quasi-rigid lens. EP, originating from musical harmonics Chu’s constant, is introduced to correct this rigid-parameter inertia and to extend physical modeling toward bio-systems. Accordingly, elastic media within non-rigid systems may be roughly divided into two categories. The first consists of rigid-deviation approximated elastic models, such as classical Hookean spring systems. The second comprises ∣EP⟩ elastic systems — bio-systems governed by the Law of Entropy Degeneration—whose dynamical characteristics differ fundamentally from those described by Hooke’s law or conventional wave equations. Classical quantum mechanics incorporates spin into the conservation of angular momentum through the relation J=L+S, which implicitly suggests spin does not belong directly to the traditional domain of energy conservation, yet still participates in angular momentum balance. This difficulty in theoretical positioning has led microscopic symmetric spin to be expressed through the “Bohr spooky” description: once one spin orientation is measured, the quantum state collapse into the opposite spin state at a spooky rate. From the historical perspective, this “Bohr spooky” claim can be traced back to a structural bias inherited from rigid body data process habits ((x+∣x'⟩, y+∣y'⟩)is arbitrarily dealt into (x,y)), and further reinforced by the postulation that the wave function is independent of gravity at any condition; introducing ∣EP⟩ term can provide significant correction to this long-standing story and non-simultaneously quantize gravity into bio-systems (within traditional rigid body frameworks, target parameters such as velocity can be calculated independent of nearby correlated motions. However, in living bio-systems, in vivo parameters under the surface-tension domain no longer possess such independence; only excreted matter or dead tissue can regain this form of independent zeroability).

, four foundational origins:

1. Ancient Classics (Western Han Dynasty):
   

   In modern Chinese, the character “帥 (shuài)” still carries meanings such as handsome, elegant, commanding, and outstanding. Therefore, the classical statement “Qi is the commander of blood; blood is the mother of Qi” (氣為血之帥，血為氣之母) contains three layers of connotation: 1) Qi is the father of blood, indicating a generative and guiding role. 2) Qi is not an ordinary father, but the most outstanding one—“帥” does not merely denote paternity, but excellence, leadership, and dominance among fathers. 3) Even the most outstanding father is still born from a mother; thus Qi itself originates from blood. Through the paired terms “shuai (帥)” and “mother (母)”, the relationship between Qi and blood is therefore fully contained. In terms of Western biomedical concepts, Qi corresponds to innate immunity, such as CRISPR/Cas9 at genomic level, while blood corresponds to blood acquired (adaptive) immunity, such as T cells, B cells, and related immune responses etc. For the human body, innate immunity cannot be enhanced through medication or injection. It can only be cultivated through proper physical spinal convergence training. In contrast, acquired immunity can, to a certain extent, be supplemented or enhanced through drugs, vaccines, or injections. The Long COVID-19 crisis is a typical example of the failure of certain indecent pharmaceutical companies’ attempts to strengthen human innate immunity through injection-based approaches. So-called approaches such as tumor vaccines are likewise largely impractical, because effective tumor suppression relies on physical innate immunity rather than on acquired immunity induced by drugs or injections. Attempting to use acquired (adaptive) immunity approaches—such as vaccines, CAR-T programming followed by reinfusion, stem cells transplantation and similar methods—to mislead the public into paying to fight tumors is in essence a commercial profit operation rather than medicine. Narratives driven by such commercial motives will not lead to genuine medical breakthroughs or true therapeutic miracles for combating cancer. As scientific practitioners, we must uphold the most fundamental ethical and safety boundaries between academic study and commercial application. In principle, academic research allows a certain degree of exaggeration and forward-looking speculation in its expression, because its core objectives are to explore the unknown and to secure research funding. Moreover, academic work is typically conducted within controlled laboratory environments that are institutionally designed to safeguard public safety. Stem cell technology provides a representative example. At the level of academic research, its concepts and potential can be extensively illustrated and discussed. In commercial application, however, this technology does not, in fact, possess the ability to directly intervene in the innate immune system. From a legal perspective, any cell-therapy product should explicitly state its fundamental limitation: “unable to intervene in innate immune function.” Organ transplantation not only fails to intervene in innate immunity, but also involves more severe problems. As a result, transplant recipients typically survive for periods far shorter than what is publicly advertised, with most recipients surviving only a few years. From a legal standpoint, organ transplantation should clearly disclose the following: “Organ transplantation requires the prior technical suppression of your innate immune system, and you must bear the severe impact of such suppression on your lifespan.” If immune potential is regarded as a form of spinal CSF physical angular momentum, then innate immunity corresponds to the core of the vortex, while adaptive immunity represents its peripheral extension. Even when a native organ is impaired, it remains connected to the vortex core. In contrast, a transplanted organ—regardless of how well it is matched or even if it is harvested from a living donor—can only occupy the peripheral region of the vortex. This effectively means that survival requires the regeneration of a substitute organ component within the core itself, a process that imposes a substantial burden on lifespan. At present, the difficulty for the public to track post-transplant survival outcomes is driven by commercial interests and constitutes a serious violation of the fundamental boundary between academic research and real-world application, deliberately obscuring the severe lifespan impacts described above. Albert Einstein came to fully recognize this fundamental distinction between academic study vs. real application only in his later years. As an academic researcher, he was entirely free to propose and develop atomic theoretical results such as E=mc2. However, when he wrote to President Roosevelt and encouraged the practical development of the atomic bomb, he effectively crossed the public-safety boundary separating academic research from real-world application, thereby resulting in mass killing of innocent humans. After realizing the implications of this action, Einstein reportedly fell into a state of profound remorse in his later life. Innate immunity is not only related to organ transplantation, but is also deeply connected to sleep. The CSF spinal spin during sleep may be expressed as n_{kinnate immunity}=n_{k+1innate immunity} ∣EP⟩ _sleep, and through ∣EP⟩ it drives n_{kacquired immunity}=n_{k+1acquired immunity} ∣EP⟩ _sleep, When innate immunity is depleted, it may be partially compensated through acquired immunity via sleep; however, the fundamental way to delay the decline of innate immunity itself is physical training, and it cannot be obtained through any chemical injections or pharmaceutical interventions. We have interviewed a number of organ-transplant patients, and irrespective of other postoperative complications, their sleep duration and quality were severely affected. In other words, sleep characteristics that would normally emerge gradually over years of aging appear to become concentrated within a single transplantation event. On-duty physicians often explain this deterioration in sleep quality as a normal postoperative reaction that simply requires adaptation; however, these clinicians never understand that sleep is an absolutely reliable indicator of aging, almost all biological simultaneous time is generated during sleep process; therefore, the post-transplantation phenomena should be interpreted as sleep aging following a severe impact on innate immunity. These clinical interviews suggest that the spinal converging physical training embodied in ancient Chinese Wudang Kungfu six centuries ago was not only far ahead of its time, but offers insights into sleep mechanisms that go far beyond the current modern medicine.

   "Qi is the father of blood and blood is the mother of Qi."
2. Wudang Taihe lineage Kungfu practice of the

   Kneeling sitting(liver longevity tendon-stretch posture), is ancient Chinese anti-stress physical discipline that spans from the Shang Dynasty (originated 1300 BCE restricted to the aristocratic and ritual elite, to the Qin–Han period (221 BCE-), became a mandatory posture for the general population), and continued until the end of the Qing Dynasty (-1912 CE). Cultural remnants of this practice can still be observed in today’s Japan. This method is indeed the world’s top one layperson anti-stress innate immunity physical training. If adopted from childhood as a replacement for conventional seating, even without any traditional Kungfu or modern sportive training or deliberate changes to daily life style, it still can extend lifespan by over a decade. It is the irreplaceable greatest treasure that Chinese people contributed to global health. In its advanced format, kneeling sitting evolves into double-lotus sitting. Bridge position (金剛鐵板橋) as the world’s top one innate immune anti-stress physical conditioning for professional Kungfu practitioners—has been preserved exclusively within the Wudang Taihe lineage in China. This system integrates the Shaolin practice of neck-suspension training with the Wudang foot-suspension training and ultimately integrates through the Bridge position, with decades of progressive training. Under such top anti-stress loading, the paired sovereign acupoints—the navel (Yuanqi Eye元氣眼) and the hair vortex of the head (Baihui百会)—form a structural bridge through which spinal CSF momenta accumulate irrotational entropy converging governed byn_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩ to drive the entropy preservation of other subordinate acupionts. All traditional Chinese acupoints operate effectively only when they exist in a living asymmetric-spin state, enabling the effective intaking of ∣EP⟩. Here, the acupoint system of the human body can be intuitively understood as a multi-gyroscope system. The two anchoring poles of the body’s primary gyroscope correspond to the sovereign acupoints Baihui and the navel. The driving force of irrotational entropy enables this primary gyroscopic axis to activate and stabilize the spin of subordinate gyroscopes associated with other acupoints at different functional levels, guiding each toward its proper orientation. In this framework, what is commonly referred to as innate immunity corresponds to the robust, well-aligned operation of these biological gyroscopes, whereas aging reflects the gradual attenuation of their rotational coherence and inversion, leading to increasing directional disorder. The acupoint irrotationality in traditional Chinese medicine exists only in living conditions and therefore cannot be observed through anatomical dissection. It is important to note that no matter how many gyroscopes are installed on an aircraft, they will ultimately align toward the same direction. In contrast, the innate immune acupoint irrotationality of human body—whether described as gyroscopes or quadrupoles—must firmly point in different directions. This is because their coupling is not a Schrödinger-cat–type zeroable classical quantum superposition, but rather a ∣EP⟩ non-zeroable inversion superposition through which irrotationality is accumulated, non-zeroability nurtures multi-directional inertia. Only after death does this acupoint multi-gyroscope or quadrupole system finally collapse (or become zeroable) into a single common direction. (Ref. spin entropy-stabilized “center of mass”. Under both Newtonian mechanics and quantum mechanics, spin is not a gravity-relevant parameter; only within relativistic frameworks does an extremely weak coupling exist. However, in bio-systems, gravity effects associated with spin can be exponentially amplified through irrotational entropy. Therefore, an entropy-stabilized “center of mass” can be defined. In conventional quantum mechanics, microcosmic symmetric spin is defined to be incorporated into the framework of angular momentum conservation through the representation theory of rotational symmetry (J=L+S), and is therefore formally placed within the domain of energy conservation. This definition-based association, however, remains primarily algebraic rather than being grounded in an explicit physical mechanism. The stability embodied by spin is more naturally attributed to entropy preservation. Within our theoretical framework, without ∣EP⟩ serving as a bridging mechanism, spin cannot be placed on the same physical footing as energy-conservation parameters within a single equation.) Notably, the Wudang acupoint system (irrotational entropy stabilized “center of mass”) differs significantly from that described in Chinese medical books. It is organized into the 36 Tiangang and 72 Disha, and further extends into larger structural units such as acupoint fields and acupoint plates. In contrast, most modern Shaolin martial publications rely solely on acupoints listed in traditional Chinese medical literatures. This discrepancy likely reflects historical disruptions—including warfare and the Cultural Revolution—during which much of the original Shaolin 72 Arts was lost. Consequently, many contemporary Shaolin manuals appear to be later reconstructions rather than faithful representations of the original lineage. The mechanism of innate immunity anti-stress physical training follows the weighted Le Châtelier’s principle. The original principle is used to determine the direction of chemical equilibrium shifts: when equilibrium conditions change, the system moves in a direction that counteracts the imposed disturbance. However, the classical formulation does not involve weighting. Suppose that an untrained movement manifests as a Le Châtelier vertebral configuration. The strengthening of one segment through such a movement would induce other vertebral elements to adjust through EP to shift in a direction that reduces the influence of that segment trajectory. After long term repetitive physical training, this same movement acquires a weighting effect on the vertebral configuration (the vertebra involved is reinforced through repetitiveness memory, anti-stress processes themselves are for accumulating “weight” on the spine ). Once training is completed and consolidated, the movement can establish a new equilibrium follows the weighted vertebral configuration. This is the physical mechanism underlying innate immunity. CRISPR/Cas9 represents an innate immune system reported at the genomic level and also follows this principle. When a host acquires an exogenous DNA fragment, the fragment is initially attenuated according to a Le Châtelier response; genes with sufficient similarity are regulated in a direction that reduces its influence. However, if similar external fragments are repeatedly introduced in abundance, the host’s genome becomes “trained” to assign weighting to them. In this sense, the emergence and evolution of genes also follow the same physical training principle — extended over geological time scales and coupled with reproduction. CRISPR/Cas9 was once exaggerated as a so-called “genetic magic scissors,” and even its inventors became entangled in controversial and indecent patent disputes because of it. In reality, it is merely a natural outcome of life processes that follow entropy preservation. As a research tool within academia, it carries genuine educational value, but it should never be abused in ways that cross the boundaries of public safety. It is far from representing the future of life science, and the commercial misuse of such tools is a profane of the natural laws of life that should be restrained at the legal level. Those opportunists who propaganda to edit human embryos often demonstrate a level of gene-editing capability so rudimentary that none of them can convert E. coli into Salmonella with a 0.0001 % successful rate — to claim the ability to edit human embryos under so poor technical levels is equivalent to claiming that the only bicycle level tools in their hands can be used to drive humans to land on the Moon.

   Bridge Position
3. Quantum non-simultaneous extension of thermodynamic

   Thermodynamic entropy is derived from the Carnot cycle. Within this framework, irreversible cycles generate entropy: ≥Q/T . However, once entropy generation satisfies the conditions of biological quantization, in vivo processes no longer superimpose in the Schrödinger’s-cat manner but follow n_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩, where n_k and n_k+1 are integers that entangle to procure ∣EP⟩ to accumulate non-simultaneous time. The finiteness of life arises precisely because bio-systems can only survive within non-simultaneous temporal states and are incapable of operating by rigid, absolutely zeroable simultaneous time. We can simply state that non-simultaneous time emerges when rigid time intakes EP through a surface-tension region.
   Shannon entropy is a form of entropy defined in terms of uncertainty. The stability of traditional rigid time is pre-assigned by the absolute zeroability inherent in Newtonian axioms. In contrast, the stability required by non-simultaneous time can be obtained from Shannon entropy loci. Regardless of how such non-simultaneous time evolves, it must rely on its Shannon entropy loci to acquire sufficient stability. In this sense, chaotic entropy coined by Boltzmann is entropy that lacks adequate stability, whereas irrotational entropy is entropy that becomes quantized through the stability conferred by Shannon entropy loci (the second law of thermodynamics is valid only for chaotic entropy systems that lack Shannon-entropy-locus stability. It does not apply to irrotational entropy whose Shannon entropy loci are stabilized by gravity. This is because this law is built entirely on a rigid body parameter model and has never engaged the non-rigid body paradigm.). In traditional quantum mechanics, the wave function and spin are entirely unrelated to gravity or entropy. However, biological the spinal quantum states must rely on the entropy stability provided by gravity in order to become quantized, thereby enabling growth and evolution. Non-simultaneous time is a form of time that possesses stability at Shannon-entropy loci. In contrast, rigid time does not exhibit Shannon-entropy stability; it only maintains stability in terms of Newtonian coordinate frameworks or, at most, stability of curvature within Einstein curved spacetime. By the same reasoning, the symmetric spin described in classical quantum mechanics does not possess an entropy stabilized “center of mass”. Only asymmetric spin configurations admit an entropy-stabilized “center of mass”. When referring here to the ancient concept of the “center of mass,” it is necessary to emphasize that the gravitational constant G measured in Newton’s law of universal gravitation—specifically the Cavendish constant G_Cavendish, determined from a rigid center of mass—is far smaller than the gravitational constant expressed in living biological systems, G_bio-system which is stabilized by an irrotational entropy. If calculated using the traditional Cavendish rigid approach, discrepancies in gravitational G experimental measurements can be as large as 10⁹, which means both time and entropy have non-zeroable “weight”. Note: This form of non-zeroability cannot be fully described by either Euclidean geometry or traditional non-Euclidean geometries. Even Riemannian geometry, which has underpinned general relativity since Einstein, remains fundamentally based on the assumption of local zeroability and therefore fails to provide a complete characterization. By contrast, Chu’s constant, originating from musical structure rather than geometric formalism, is able to capture this non-zeroable behavior quite well. The macroscopically extensible asymmetric spin exhibits a Shannon entropy loci stabilized “center of mass” difference of up to 10⁹ compared with the traditional microscopically symmetric spin. This contrast reveals the fundamental “quantum superposition center of gravity” distinction underlying Schrödinger’s cat. Schrödinger originally introduced the cat to express his deep concern about the simultaneous superposition of a dead cat and a living cat. Because conventional quantum superposition is assumed to be independent of gravity, such a paradoxical coexistence becomes unavoidable. In contrast, within biological condensed systems, spinal vector quantum superposition is associated with gravitational irrotationality at a 109 level. As a result, quantum states undergo an inversion driven by ∣EP⟩ or gravity prior to superposition. In this way, although the “Schrödinger dead cat” may still be superposed through the traditional approach, the “Schrödinger living cat” must follow an “inversion then superposition process”, thereby completely avoiding the simultaneous overlap of “dead cat” and “living cat” together. Here we employ a conventional quantum-mechanical framework; nevertheless, similar conclusions can also be obtained within a relativistic framework. In the low-velocity regime, Einstein’s general relativity yields results not markedly different from Newtonian mechanics, largely because the Cavendish mutation experiments conducted in the Medical Science Building B343 at Tsinghua University were not observed at that time. If the inversion level is modeled as a quantized dynamic curvature tensor under a surface tension regime, then the 109 level of entropy stabilized center of gravity difference between the dead cat and the living cat inevitably produces a large curvature tensor separation. This new form of quantum superposition therefore cannot superpose the “Schrödinger dead cat” and the “Schrödinger living cat” simultaneously. Historically, the Schrödinger equation claimed that the gravitational effect is neglected; ironically, this omission now leads directly to singularities within the equation itself — one cannot help but marvel at history’s fairness to Schrödinger’s own concern (the quiddity of Schrödinger’s concern was whether a quantum superposition process is fundamentally affected by gravity. An experiment carried out at 7-315 Traders Blvd E, Mississauga ON, Canada — participated by a six-year-old kindergarten girl with a simple ice-cream clips in— historically “returned fairness to Schrödinger’s own concern”) ! The non-rigid body gravitational “inversion before superposition” quantum interaction (asymmetric spin with entropy stabilized “center of mass”) has never been observed in physics, yet it has been employed in musical harmonics for centuries. We can therefore firmly conclude that Chu’s constant, through “Schrödinger’s cat”, unifies quantum mechanics and general relativity under a common gravitational theoretical structure capable of completely describing non-rigid body entropy degenerated biological growth and evolution. (Quantum entanglement historically stood at the center of the Bohr–Einstein debate, which ultimately concluded with the scientific community accepting the “Bohr spooky” description due to the inability to refute it decisively. A living organism can be viewed as a multi-level, many-body quantum entanglement system; however, these asymmetric many-body entangled pairs/structures coexist through a weighted Le Châtelier’s principle, or, in other words, persist through non-simultaneous time, and therefore do not collapse in the Bohr spooky manner. The metabolic wastes in bio-systems can be interpreted as the collapse of certain entangled pairs/structures. Nevertheless, the rate of such decoherance corresponds only to ordinary biological timescales, which are far slower than the “spooky speed” claimed by Bohr. Because biological excreted waste is a process in which G_bio-system entangled structures undergo decoherence and retrogradation to G_Cavendish entangled structures.)

   Carnot-cycle
   entropy under surface-tension conditions
4. An elevation from microcoscopic "Bohr spooky" symmetric spin to Landau two-fluid condensed-state macroscopic

   According to Landau’s two-fluid model of ultra–low-temperature condensed matter, a superfluid represents a state in which the system no longer dissipates energy. Extending this framework, the Law of Entropy Degeneration n_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩ describes the ∣EP⟩ sustaining relationship among the superfluid component, the normal-fluid component, and the environment. Such a theoretical extension requires that the traditional intrinsic, microscopically symmetric spin—defined at the level of fundamental symmetry and lacking an aging cycle—be upgraded to a macroscopically extensible asymmetric spin based on surface tensions, which inherently follows an aging cycle. Only this extended asymmetric spin framework can be applied to biological systems, where heredity and evolution are steering by ∣EP⟩. Accordingly, biological systems may be regarded as a room-temperature (∣EP⟩ irrotational entropy macroscopic) condensed-matter entities (bio-condensation achieved through surface tension rather than cryogenic cooling).
   For the human body, all in vivo relationships—whether macroscopic, such as information perceived by vision, hearing, smell, and taste; structural relationships among organs, tissues, muscles, and ligaments; or microscopic relationships among DNA/RNA, proteins, and cells—are bound by irrotational entropy linkages. In other words, all of these relationships can be expressed by the interactions from different levels of the Law of Entropy Degeneration n_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩. There exist no internal biological relationships that lie outside this law. In traditional biology, sensory systems such as vision and hearing are described using entirely different conceptual frameworks, and their mutual relationship remains fundamentally unexplained. This results in a fragmented, “blind-men-and-the-elephant” understanding of life processes. The Entropy Preservation Law fundamentally changes this situation. Classical quantum mechanics has traditionally been regarded as applicable only to the microscopic world, and even quantum physicists themselves have generally assumed that their work bears little relevance to biological research. However, with the Law of Entropy Degeneration: n_k=n_k+1+∣EP⟩, all living systems—regardless of size or evolutionary complexity—can and must be described in a quantized manner as long as they are alive. The biological spine itself constitutes a macroscopically visible, fundamental quantized structure. The entropy-stabilized “center of gravity” of asymmetric biological spin originates from surface tension. In classical quantum mechanics, early pioneers neglected both surface tension and gravitational effects, leaving symmetric spin as their only admissible option. This remaining option consequently forces spin to be associated with the domain of energy conservation, thereby inevitably obscuring its intrinsic characteristics of entropy preservation.
   Modern molecular biology and genetics—including genomics, proteomics, and various metabolic networks and interaction frameworks—were largely developed under the historical paradigm centered on energy conservation. As theoretical boundaries evolve, a substantial portion of these frameworks requires fundamental revision in order to be compatible with a new paradigm based on entropy preservation. It should be emphasized that symmetric spin and asymmetric spin differ fundamentally in five mathematical-physical techniques. First, their conditions of occurrence differ. Symmetric spin is an intrinsic property that can arise anywhere, but exists only within the microcosmic domain. In contrast, asymmetric spin can occur only within the superfluid component. It should be noted that, in the rotational momentum matrix, the superfluid and normal-fluid components are completely inseparable; together, they span both the microcosmic and macrocosmic regimes. Second, their dynamical response mechanisms differ. Symmetric spin exhibits the Bohr “spooky” characteristic: once one member of an entangled pair is measured, the other collapses instantaneously into the opposite spin state, with a “spooky” collapse speed far exceeding that of light. In contrast, for asymmetric spin, states such as 〖 n〗_k and n_(k+1) do not exhibit such “supernatural” collapse behavior; instead, their actual response speed is far below the speed of light (e.g., taking respiration as an example, during the breathing process the transformation of the alveolar superfluid states 〖 n〗_k and n_(k+1) through the absorption of ∣EP⟩ proceeds at a rate determined only by the respiratory rhythm itself for dozens of folds). Third, their dependence on the environment differs. Symmetric spin is an intrinsic property independent of the environment, whereas asymmetric spin requires the presence of ∣EP⟩ to be sustained. Only asymmetric structures permit the uptake of ∣EP⟩. This is also the fundamental reason why bio-systems sustain themselves through irrotational entropy rather than through conventional Noether symmetric energy. Fourth, the collapse trigger conditions and outcomes are different. Symmetric spin states may collapse into a non-living being eigenstate merely as a result of measurement, whereas asymmetric spin correlations persist at any level until the structure at that level ceases to function (an illustrative example is the heartbeat: unless the biological organism dies, the heart does not stop beating). This distinction largely arises from the difference in collapse outcomes: the collapse result of symmetric spin is a bio-inactive eigenstate, whereas asymmetric spin alternatively jumps between bio-active n_k and n_k+1. As long as the ∣EP⟩ available, this bio-active linearity shifting never ceases. We can say that microscopically claimed symmetric spin corresponds to non-living being measurement-induced collapse, whereas macroscopically extensible asymmetric spin reflects bio-active structurally persistent aging. Fifth—and perhaps the most perplexing point — I have posted a question to many well-known physicists, including my early mentor in general relativity: if spin is regarded as symmetric in monatomic gas states, does electronic spin remain symmetric once two elements form a compound and still follow “Bohr Spooky Collapse”? Consider even the simplest example, CO₂, or even single element such as O₂, or ozone molecules (O₃). Most respondents tend to avoid the issue, suggesting that it belongs to chemistry rather than physics; a small number attempt direct explanations, often invoking orbital hybridization or related models, yet such answers remain far from fully convincing. If quantum mechanics introduces spin quantum numbers to maintain logical consistency, then why could the electron spin in a simple small molecule such as CO₂ not be viewed as a persist asymmetric interchange between the C & O atomic orbital? e.g. n_{k_carbon}=n_{k+1_oxygen}+∣EP⟩? This fifth point should be regarded as a quantum disciplinary bottleneck rather than a matter of mathematical-physical techniques like the previous four. However, because it’s the critically point concerns the convergence of classical quantum mechanics with bio-systems, it is then presented here specifically.

   asymmetric spin.

See the annotations attached to the highlighted yellow text or the article for details: Quantum Gravity Non-simultaneous EP Irrotational Entropy Preservation Origin of Life